Would you look up at the skyline,
at the mortar, block and glass,
and check out the reflections in my eyes.
You see they always used to be there,
even when this all was grass,
and I sang and danced about a high-rise.
- Ben Folds, "Philosophy"
The concept of characters whose only purpose is to nudge the plot slightly in a particular direction is perfectly fine in most mediums. In a film you might have an FBI agent only turn up in one scene, but that means the actor might only film for one day. Our pantomimes tend to have a rehearsal period of about 3 months, usually meeting up twice a week. That is for every named character. Whether you are the main character or someone who only appears in the second act for a dozen lines you devote two evenings of each week during your winter. I never liked that. It never seemed fair. But, at the end of the day, even if a character had a mere handful of lines they are needed for an effective rehearsal.
So, these actors give up a great deal of their time to rehearse and perform characters who rarely have much to do in the Panto. They seldom have a 'character' beyond a name/title, seldom a joke to tell, and barely any interaction with the audience or even with the play itself.
And it isn't always linked to stage time. In the majority of Pantos the 'Good Fairy' appears many times throughout the performance and, technically, influences the plot. However she tends to be confined to a small, stationary position in the corner of the stage and rarely gets to interact with characters. I feel such an important element needs 'more'. More motion. More interaction. More fun for the actor to work with.
Often Pantos find themselves with Kings, Queens, Princesses and Princes that are little more than two dimensional standees that are required to sing half a duet or two and bow at the end. And here I mean no offense to the actors at all. Personally, I've found the actors in these roles tend to make the very best from the awfully thin roles they are given.
On the other end of the scale from all this there are characters that appear for a mere couple of scenes, but are truly memorable, usually for comedy value. The greatest example of this in recent years of the Theatre on the Steps would be 'Slurp' from Xmas 2011's Snow White. The character featured in all of three scenes, but was integral to each of them and had some of the best melodramatic moments of the Panto. While there wasn't all that much stage time for the actor, the part was good enough that he could have fun with it and be proud of his contribution.
Remember that Hannibal Lector (rightfully) won Anthony Hopkins an Oscar, but he only featured in a little over 16 minutes of Silence of the Lambs.
So, on to how this affects the Panto in Process.
Right now I am focused on a version of Cinderella, as a previous blog entry hinted (if you got the clue then congratulate yourself, if not... Try harder next time!). I'll add here a quick note that there are a dozen reasons out of my hands that this idea may not work out, but don't worry! I have a few other ideas up my sleeve!
At this point there are 9 named characters, down from 14 (I think) in Ali Baba this year. That is a fairly hefty chop, but the key point is that each of these characters has several defining characteristics and enough influence on the plot to justify both the actors spending their time on them and the audience investing themselves in them. This leads to other problems though, I don't want to turn people away who want to be part of the Panto, who in other years we'd have enough roles for all comers. Further more, it is very important to me to be able to offer a fair few roles to the members of the Youth Theatre company at the Theatre on the Steps, as these shows always seem to be fun for them.
It is tricky to balance and hard, if not impossible, to keep everyone happy. Above all I want the audience to be invested and entertained. Perhaps nothing else really matters. But, as anyone who has ever seen a panto can attest, the more the cast are enjoying themselves the funnier and more enjoyable it is for the audience.
I promise that this will be a pantomime that everyone involved: cast, crew and audience can enjoy together.
Another quick teaser, before we part ways?
![]() |
| John Chambers (right) carrying a ventriloquist dummy. |
Alright, let me speak of (Life Time Achievement Award Winner) John Chambers.
John C (we have a lot of Johns, thus they are encoded) has traditionally played characters of regal bearing in our pantos. Often his role is something of a master of exposition, simply repeating what has just happened on stage (you know, in case you went to the bathroom).
Yet in Snow White (Xmas 2011) John and I got to rock out with some air guitar to a Queen song in a slightly surreal non sequitur. I can't speak for John, but it was my most enjoyable scene of the whole panto. It always got a great reaction and it was great to see John let his (silky white) hair down and have some crazy fun, dropping his formal facade.
If John Chambers should choose to join us for Panto Xmas 2013 he had best start preparing for more fun. Currently sitting awaiting review on my desk (ok, on my couch) is the final 'big scene' of Cinderella. Naturally Cinderella features a Prince (Charming) and, in this instance, his father: a King. The King plays heavily into this final scene and he will need to be able to keep a straight face in a scene featuring: cross dressers, a blindfold, and much intrusion of personal space.
Not quite as disgusting as a certain scene from this year with an apple (I'm so sorry...), but it should be memorable. Oh yes, memorable...
Go ahead you can laugh all you want
I got my philosophy
and I trust it like the ground.
And thats why my philosophy
It keeps me walking when I'm falling down.
- Ben Folds, "Philosophy"



